The document describes how the tester will physically run the test, the physical set-up required, and the procedure steps that need to be followed. The standard defines ten procedure steps that may be applied when running a test.
This curiously named document is not derived from the Test Plan but is the handover document from the previous stage of development. It describes the items being delivered for testing, where to find them, what is new about them, and gives approval for their release.
The importance of the document is to provide to the testers a warranty that the items are fit to be tested and gives a clear mandate to start testing. Do not start testing without receiving one! When the tests have been developed then they can be run. The schedule of what Test Cases are run and when, is defined in the Test Plan. The Test Log records the details of what Test Cases have been run, the order of their running, and the results of the test.
The results are either the test passed, meaning that the actual and expected results were identical, or it failed and that there was a discrepancy. If there is a discrepancy than one or more Test Incident Reports are raised or updated, and their identities recorded on the Test Log. The Test Log is important as it allows progress of the testing to be checked, as well as providing valuable information for finding out what caused an incident.
If an incident is a coding fault, the fault may have occurred not in the Test Case that failed but in one that was run previously.
Thus the sequence of the tests enables the fault to be found. This document is deliberately named as an incident report, and not a fault report. The reason is that a discrepancy between expected and actual results can occur for a number of reasons other than a fault in the system.
These include the expected results being wrong, the test being run wrongly, or inconsistency in the requirements meaning that more than one interpretation could be made. The report consists of all details of the incident such as actual and expected results, when it failed, and any supporting evidence that will help in its resolution.
The report will also include, if possible, an assessment of the impact upon testing of an incident. A failed test may raise more than one incident, and at the same time an incident may occur in more than one test failure. Taking the Billing project example, if both test cases completely failed than three Test Incident Reports would be raised:. It is important to separate incidents by the features being tested so as to get a good idea of the quality of the system, and allow progress in fixing faults to be checked.
A useful derivative document from the Test Incident Report is a Test Incident Log to summarise the incidents and the status. Eventually testing will be completed according the criteria specified in the Test Plan. This International Standard also provides processes that can be employed for defining, controlling, and improving software life cycle processes within an organization or a project.
It is rare to encounter a complex system without software, and all software systems require physical system components hardware to operate, either as part of the software system of interest or as an enabling system or infrastructure. Processes in both standards have the same process purpose and process outcomes, but differ in activities and tasks to perform software engineering or systems engineering, respectively.
Additional Resources Details. Pars Approved PAR. Christy Bahn. This standard:? This standard provides a detailed presentation of system and software integration, considering:?
The discussion and advice are intended to aid in the preparation of the normative content of project management plans. It places requirements on and recommends methods for defining and using integrity levels and their integrity level requirements, including the assignment of integrity levels to systems, software products, their elements, and relevant external dependencies. This International Standard unifies technical and management requirements and guidance from several of these sources to specify the requirements for the content of a SEMP and to provide a common SEMP format.
Software testing? Part 1:Concepts and definitions. Part 2:Test processes. It supports dynamic testing, functional and non-functional testing, manual and automated testing, and scripted and unscripted testing.
Risk-based testing is a common industry approach to strategizing and managing testing. Risk-based testing allows testing to be prioritized and focused on the most important features and functions.
Part 3: Test documentation. Annex A contains outlines of the contents of each document. Annex C contains an overview of the examples. Annexes D to S contain examples of the application of the templates. This International Standard applies to the acquisition of software systems, products and services, to the supply, development, operation, maintenance, and disposal of software products and the software portion of any system, whether performed internally or externally to an organization.
This International Standard also provides processes that can be employed for defining, controlling, and improving software life cycle processes within an organization or a project.
System life cycle processes. It is rare to encounter a complex system without software, and all software systems require physical system components hardware to operate, either as part of the software system of interest or as an enabling system or infrastructure.
Processes in both standards have the same process purpose and process outcomes, but differ in activities and tasks to perform software engineering or systems engineering, respectively. This International Standard provides guidance for organizations in the application of ISO to the acquisition, supply, development, operation, and maintenance of computer software and related support services.
It does not add to or other wise change the requirements of ISO The measurement process is applicable to system and software engineering and management disciplines. This document identifies a process that supports defining a suitable set of measures that address specific information needs. This document:? This document provides a universally applicable standard for practitioners responsible for managing risks associated with systems and software over their life cycle.
This document is suitable for the management of all risks encountered in any organization or project appropriate to the systems or software projects regardless of context, type of industry, technologies utilized, or organizational structures involved.
This document does not provide detailed information about risk management practices, techniques, or tools which are widely available in other publications. Instead this document focuses on providing a comprehensive reference for integrating the large and wide variety of processes, practices, techniques, and tools encountered in systems and software engineering projects and other lifecycle activities into a unified approach for risk management, with the purpose of providing effective and efficient risk management while meeting the expectations and requirements of organization and project stakeholders.
This is to help ensure consistency in system concepts and life cycle concepts, models, stages, processes, process application, key points of view, adaptation and use in various domains as the two International Standards are used in combination. That will in turn help a project team design a life cycle model for managing the progress of their project.
This document specifies requirements and procedures for managing information for users throughout the software-, services-, and systems-development life cycle. It applies to people or organizations producing suites of information, to those undertaking a single information-development project, and to information produced internally, as well as to information contracted to outside service organizations.
It provides details of the information-development and project-management processes and also presents aspects of strategic planning and translation management that managers apply.
It covers management activities related to starting a project, building a team, and managing information through the translation and localization process. It addresses productivity and quality measurements needed for management control.
This document is independent of the software tools that may be used to produce or manage information for users and applies to both printed, embedded, and mobile information. Much of its guidance is applicable to information for users of systems of hardware as well as software, systems, and services.
This document contains provisions for the processes and products related to the engineering of requirements for systems and software products and services throughout the life cycle. This document provides a set of critical considerations to be addressed at key points in the life cycle of systems created by humans.
This document refers to a constituent system that will interact in a system of systems as the system of interest SOI. Selected subsets of these considerations may be applied throughout the life of systems. This is accomplished through the involvement of all stakeholders with the ultimate goal of achieving customer satisfaction by ensuring that when delivered, the system will operate effectively in the operational or business environment which will typically be characterized as one or more systems of systems.
This document concerns those systems that are man-made and are configured with one or more of the following: hardware, software, humans, procedures and facilities.
This document establishes guidance to implement a common framework for software life cycle processes, with well-defined terminology, that can be referenced by the software industry. This document provides guidance on defining, controlling, and improving software life cycle processes within an organization or a project.
It recommends methods and approaches suitable for a variety of life cycle models. The guidance emphasizes the importance of establishing a strategy, planning, and the involvement of stakeholders, with the ultimate goal of achieving customer satisfaction. Its purpose is to help ensure consistency in system concepts and life cycle concepts, models, stages, processes, process application, key points of view, adaptation and use in various domains. This document concentrates on specific guidance for the Technical processes and how they can be effectively used during the software life cycle.
It is intended to be useful in a variety of software life cycle situations, including the use of agile methods. This document defines a normalized taxonomy for systems of systems SoS to facilitate communications among stakeholders. It also briefly explains what a taxonomy is and how it applies to the SoS to aid in understanding and communication.
Taxonomies provide a means in many fields to classify and describe the relationships between the relevant elements being studied. The elements of the taxonomy, or taxa, form a partitioning or means of classification within that body of knowledge. In the context of systems of systems SoS , the relevant elements are, by definition, systems themselves. Using essential characteristics to partition the various types of SoS provides an abbreviated nomenclature for thinking about SoS.
Based on the taxonomies, different approaches to the engineering of systems of systems are possible, improving the efficiency and effectiveness of systems of systems engineering.
This document provides guidance and recommendations for assurance of a selected claim about the system-of-interest by achieving the claim and showing the achievement. This document provides guidance for organizations in the application of ISO to the acquisition, supply, development, operation and maintenance of computer software and related support services. This document does not add to or otherwise change the requirements of ISO The application of this document is appropriate to software that is: part of a commercial contract with another organization, a product available for a market sector, used to support the processes of an organization, embedded in a hardware product, or related to software services.
Some organizations may be involved in all the above activities; others may specialize in one area. Whatever the situation, the organization? This document identifies the issues that should be addressed and is independent of the technology, life cycle models, development processes, sequence of activities and organizational structure used by an organization.
Additional processes and process outcomes unique to SoS can still be needed and are not covered by this document. This document explores the similarities and differences between systems and SoS and, by extension, the similarities and differences between engineering of systems and SoS.
The guidance contained in this document is expected to evolve as the discipline matures.
0コメント